|
|
Irmline Veit-Brause
 |
| New turns in the theory of history, or another effort at overcoming the "dialogue des sourds" |
| Pages: 3-16 |
|
|
| Constantin Fasolt
|
| Red herrings: relativism, objectivism, and other false dilemmas |
| Pages: 17-26 |
|
|
| Johannes Fried
|
| Can neuro-biology help us to understand history? |
| Pages: 27-37 |
|
|
| Jonathan Gorman
|
| The truth of historical theory |
| Pages: 38-48 |
|
|
| Martin Stuart-Fox
|
| History and the return to science |
| Pages: 49-61 |
|
|
| Pim den Boer
|
| Vicissitudes of historiography: maid and mistress |
| Pages: 62-72 |
|
|
| Rolf Torstendahl
|
| History-writing as professional production of knowledge |
| Pages: 73-88 |
|
|
| Daniel Fulda
|
| Why and how "history" depends on readerly narrativization. The cognitivist approach, its potential and its problems |
| Pages: 89-99 |
|
|
| Jeff Palmas
|
| Truth in history: some conceptions and misconceptions |
| Pages: 100-111 |
|
|
| Chen Qineng
|
| The "New History" in China: a contrast to the West |
| Pages: 112-118 |
|
|
| Fernando Sanchez-Marcos
|
| From a science-history to memory-history? The attractiveness and risks of a historiographical trend |
| Pages: 119-127 |
|
|
| Christopher Lloyd
|
| Beyond sciences in Historical theory? Critical commentary on the history/science distinction |
| Pages: 128-138 |
